<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Post by Author Kirk Curnutt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://readingtoolate.net/2009/01/08/guest-post-by-author-kirk-curnutt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://readingtoolate.net/2009/01/08/guest-post-by-author-kirk-curnutt/</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a sleep-deprived bibliophile...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://readingtoolate.net/2009/01/08/guest-post-by-author-kirk-curnutt/comment-page-1/#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingtoolate.net/?p=1438#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>Great post!  I think I asked him a question like this in my interview.  St. Clair was the hardest to read, but he was very well written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I think I asked him a question like this in my interview.  St. Clair was the hardest to read, but he was very well written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie</title>
		<link>http://readingtoolate.net/2009/01/08/guest-post-by-author-kirk-curnutt/comment-page-1/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readingtoolate.net/?p=1438#comment-2367</guid>
		<description>I thought St. Claire was the hardest to read too. I have that same tendency to go off into a narrative in my head - a writer thing perhaps? - But the narrative is thick and textured. Heim is straight forward and Sis is easy for me because having been widowed young, I know the burden of being thought strong and wise when it's simply not that simple.

I didn't really see Dickie as a main character though. I was a bit annoyed to have spend time with his pov. I suppose though that the whale was a main character too, so why not Dickie.

I am not quite finished. Tomorrow probably. I would like to say that you are a very good writer. The book is good. It has meat on its bones. Not fast food at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought St. Claire was the hardest to read too. I have that same tendency to go off into a narrative in my head - a writer thing perhaps? - But the narrative is thick and textured. Heim is straight forward and Sis is easy for me because having been widowed young, I know the burden of being thought strong and wise when it&#8217;s simply not that simple.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really see Dickie as a main character though. I was a bit annoyed to have spend time with his pov. I suppose though that the whale was a main character too, so why not Dickie.</p>
<p>I am not quite finished. Tomorrow probably. I would like to say that you are a very good writer. The book is good. It has meat on its bones. Not fast food at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
